Diane Hillmann is Director of Metadata Initiatives and the Information Institute of Syracuse (formerly of Cornell)
There are several converging trends:
- More catalogers work at a support staff level than as professional librarians
- More cataloging records are selected by machines
- More catalog records are being captured from publisher data or other sources
- More updating of catalog records is done via batch processes
- Libraries continue to de-emphasize processing of secondary research products (books and serials) in favour of unique, primary materials
Options:
- Extinction
- Retool
Extinction:
- Keep cranking about how nobody appreciates us
- Asert over and over that we’re already doing everything right – why should we change?
- Adopt a ‘chicke little’ approach to envisioning the future “the sky is falling”
Retool
- Consider what cataloger do, and what they will do, and map training
- Look for support for retraining at many levels
- Find a new job title – catalogers do a lot of other things
What do ‘metadata librarians’ do (as opposed catalogers – the retooled cataloger):
- Think about descriptive data without pre-conceptions around descriptive level, granularity or descriptive vocabs
- Consider the entirety of the discovery and access issues around a set or collection of materials
- Consider users and uses beyond an individual service when making data design decisions
The metadata librarian is
- aware of changing user needs
- understands the evolving information environment
- works collaboratively with technical staff
- familiar with all metadata formats and encoding standards
The metadata librarian skill set is:
- Views data as collections, sets or streams
- Familiar with a variety of metadata formats (DC, VRA Core, MODS etc.)
- Understands basics of data encoding (XML, RDF etc.) but is generally not a provrammer
- Understands the various ways that data can be created (by humans or machines) and manipulated (crosswalked etc.)
Characterisitics of the New World:
- No more Integrated Library Systems
- Bibliographic utilities are unlikely to be the ‘central node’ for all data
- Creation of metadata will become far more decentralized – not all library data
- Nobody knows how this will all shake out
- But: Metadata Librarians will be critical in forging solutions
Disintegrated Library Systems:
- All metadata will not be managed in and delivered from one central store
- Discovery is the first function that is being disaggregated from the ILS – there will be others
- Metadata may be managed in a variety of databases, structures and systems
- …
Role of bibliographic utilities:
- Optimized to be the middleman of the traditional data sharing system
- Currently limited to handling MARC data – not sure whether or when that will change (RDA will be firths challenge here)
- New services are contemplated
(as an aside OCLC getting a hard time here today – feel a bit sorry for Roy!)
New models of creation and distribution
- All data will not be created by librarians
- some will originate from machine processes
- We need to exchange data based on a more open model – on the web
- Broader use of OAI-PMH is a good start towards opening data beyond applications and bespoke portals
- Need to avoid commoditizing DATA instead base business model on building necessary SERVICES
Not sure about OAI-PMH – why not just published the stuff on a webpage with semantic markup to give structure?
Open data:
- Nobody knows how rich our data is unless we make it fully available – we can’t compete as data providers unless we do this
Technorati Tags: ala2008